LG 40WP95C-W vs ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
LG 40WP95C-W
39.7″ · 5120×2160 · 72 Hz · IPSViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
32″ · 1920×1080 · 165 Hz · VALG 40WP95C-W and ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61.
- Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 72 Hz).
- Response time: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
LG 40WP95C-W
If you care most about resolution, response time.
ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 40WP95C-W | ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD | |
|---|---|---|
| 60 | Gear score | 61 |
| 39.7″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 5120×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 72 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 6 ms |
| ≈ $1,400 | Estimated price | ≈ $199 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 40WP95C-W or ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD better?
LG 40WP95C-W and ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 60 and 61. Resolution: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5120×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 72 Hz). Response time: LG 40WP95C-W leads (5 ms vs 6 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD leads (165 Hz vs 72 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG 40WP95C-W ≈ $1,400, ViewSonic VX3218-PC-MHD ≈ $199. Current prices vary by store.