LG 49WQ95C-W vs MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
LG 49WQ95C-W
49″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · Nano IPSMSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VALG 49WQ95C-W and MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
LG 49WQ95C-W
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG 49WQ95C-W | MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 49″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 5120×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| Nano IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $1,500 | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG 49WQ95C-W or MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD better?
LG 49WQ95C-W and MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: LG 49WQ95C-W leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: LG 49WQ95C-W ≈ $1,500, MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD ≈ $350. Current prices vary by store.