LG E1910P-BN vs Philips 278C4QHSN
LG E1910P-BN
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TNPhilips 278C4QHSN
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzLG E1910P-BN and Philips 278C4QHSN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32.
- Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: LG E1910P-BN leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
LG E1910P-BN
If you care most about response time.
Philips 278C4QHSN
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1910P-BN | Philips 278C4QHSN | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Gear score | 32 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1910P-BN or Philips 278C4QHSN better?
LG E1910P-BN and Philips 278C4QHSN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32. Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Response time: LG E1910P-BN leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).