Philips 278C4QHSN vs Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO
Philips 278C4QHSN
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzSamsung LS19E20KBRV/GO
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TNPhilips 278C4QHSN and Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32.
- Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
Philips 278C4QHSN
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips 278C4QHSN | Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Gear score | 32 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 19″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1280×1024 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| — | Panel | TN |
| 7 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips 278C4QHSN or Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO better?
Philips 278C4QHSN and Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32. Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Response time: Samsung LS19E20KBRV/GO leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).