Monitors / Comparison
LG E1942TC-BN vs Philips BDL3210Q/00
Monitor · LG
LG E1942TC-BN
18.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Philips
Philips BDL3210Q/00
31.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzEntry level
Refresh rate15
Resolution25
Response time30
Verdict
On specs, LG E1942TC-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00.
- Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Pick this
LG E1942TC-BN
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG E1942TC-BN | Philips BDL3210Q/00 | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | Gear score | 21 |
| 18.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1366×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG E1942TC-BN or Philips BDL3210Q/00 better?
On specs, LG E1942TC-BN comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00. Response time: LG E1942TC-BN leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Similar comparisons
LG E1942TC-BN vs ASUS VH197DLG E1942TC-BN vs ASUS VT168HLG E1942TC-BN vs LG E1942S-BNLG E1942TC-BN vs LG N1941W-KITLG E1942TC-BN vs LG N1941WP-PFPhilips BDL3210Q/00 vs ASUS VT168HPhilips BDL3210Q/00 vs ASUS VH197DPhilips BDL3210Q/00 vs Samsung LE32CPhilips BDL3210Q/00 vs AOC e1621SwPhilips BDL3210Q/00 vs LG E1942S-BN