LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B vs Philips Evnia 34M2C6500
LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B
27″ · 2560×1440 · 300 Hz · IPSPhilips Evnia 34M2C6500
34″ · 3440×1440 · 175 Hz · OLEDLG UltraGear 27G64NA-B and Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.
- Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B leads (300 Hz vs 175 Hz).
LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips Evnia 34M2C6500
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B | Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 | |
|---|---|---|
| 85 | Gear score | 85 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 300 Hz | Refresh rate | 175 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| — | Response time | 0.03 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $600 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B or Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 better?
LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B and Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85. Resolution: Philips Evnia 34M2C6500 leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B leads (300 Hz vs 175 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG UltraGear 27G64NA-B leads (300 Hz vs 175 Hz).