LG W2363D-PU vs Philips 328B1
LG W2363D-PU
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 Hz · TNPhilips 328B1
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VALG W2363D-PU and Philips 328B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55.
- Resolution: Philips 328B1 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
LG W2363D-PU
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 328B1
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| LG W2363D-PU | Philips 328B1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 54 | Gear score | 55 |
| 23″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | VA |
| 3 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $435 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is LG W2363D-PU or Philips 328B1 better?
LG W2363D-PU and Philips 328B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 54 and 55. Resolution: Philips 328B1 leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).