MSI G24C6P E2 vs VIOTEK GN32DR
MSI G24C6P E2
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · VAVIOTEK GN32DR
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · VAMSI G24C6P E2 and VIOTEK GN32DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 69.
- Resolution: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G24C6P E2 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G24C6P E2 leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
MSI G24C6P E2
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
VIOTEK GN32DR
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI G24C6P E2 | VIOTEK GN32DR | |
|---|---|---|
| 68 | Gear score | 69 |
| 23.8″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI G24C6P E2 or VIOTEK GN32DR better?
MSI G24C6P E2 and VIOTEK GN32DR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 68 and 69. Resolution: VIOTEK GN32DR leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G24C6P E2 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI G24C6P E2 leads (1 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G24C6P E2 leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).