MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 vs Samsung C49G93TSSR
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16
26.5″ · 3840×2160 · 165 Hz · OLEDSamsung C49G93TSSR
49″ · 5120×1440 · 240 Hz · VAMSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 and Samsung C49G93TSSR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85.
- Resolution: MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Samsung C49G93TSSR leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung C49G93TSSR
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 | Samsung C49G93TSSR | |
|---|---|---|
| 86 | Gear score | 85 |
| 26.5″ | Screen size | 49″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 or Samsung C49G93TSSR better?
MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 and Samsung C49G93TSSR are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 86 and 85. Resolution: MSI MAG 272UP QD-OLED E16 leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Samsung C49G93TSSR leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung C49G93TSSR leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).