MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD vs Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VASamsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
48.7″ · 5120×1440 · 144 Hz · VAMSI MAG 325CQRF-QD and Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74.
- Resolution: Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD | Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 | |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | Gear score | 74 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 48.7″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD or Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 better?
MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD and Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 74 and 74. Resolution: Samsung Odyssey G9 S49FG916 leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG 325CQRF-QD leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).