MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD vs Philips 32M1N5800A
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD
27″ · 2560×1440 · 240 Hz · VAPhilips 32M1N5800A
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD and Philips 32M1N5800A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80.
- Resolution: Philips 32M1N5800A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 32M1N5800A
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD | Philips 32M1N5800A | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Gear score | 80 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $600 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD or Philips 32M1N5800A better?
MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD and Philips 32M1N5800A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 79 and 80. Resolution: Philips 32M1N5800A leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MPG Artymis 273CQRX-QD leads (240 Hz vs 144 Hz).