Philips BDL3210Q/00 vs Samsung E1920X
Philips BDL3210Q/00
31.5″ · 1366×768 · 60 HzSamsung E1920X
18.5″ · 1360×768 · 60 HzOn specs, Samsung E1920X comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00.
- Resolution: Philips BDL3210Q/00 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768).
- Response time: Samsung E1920X leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Philips BDL3210Q/00
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung E1920X
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Philips BDL3210Q/00 | Samsung E1920X | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Gear score | 24 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 18.5″ |
| 1366×768 | Resolution | 1360×768 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| 8 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Philips BDL3210Q/00 or Samsung E1920X better?
On specs, Samsung E1920X comes out ahead: a gear score of 24 versus 21 for Philips BDL3210Q/00. Resolution: Philips BDL3210Q/00 leads (1366×768 vs 1360×768). Response time: Samsung E1920X leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).