Monitors / Comparison
Samsung C24F390 vs Samsung T22C350ND
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung C24F390
24″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung T22C350ND
21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TNAverage
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Verdict
Samsung C24F390 and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41.
- Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this
Samsung T22C350ND
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung C24F390 | Samsung T22C350ND | |
|---|---|---|
| 42 | Gear score | 41 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 21.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 2 ms |
| ≈ $70 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung C24F390 or Samsung T22C350ND better?
Samsung C24F390 and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41. Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Similar comparisons
Samsung C24F390 vs ASUS ML239HSamsung C24F390 vs ASUS MX239HSamsung C24F390 vs ASUS MX279HSamsung C24F390 vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung C24F390 vs BenQ BL2483Samsung T22C350ND vs ASUS MT276HESamsung T22C350ND vs ASUS PB238QSamsung T22C350ND vs ASUS VA249HESamsung T22C350ND vs Sony FWD48W650DSamsung T22C350ND vs Samsung SF351