Monitors / Comparison

Samsung C49G93TSSR vs Samsung Odyssey G9 G95C

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung C49G93TSSR

49″ · 5120×1440 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 85.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution97
Panel66
Response time90
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung Odyssey G9 G95C

49″ · 5120×1440 · 240 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 85.0 / 100Top tier
Refresh rate86
Resolution97
Panel66
Response time90
Verdict

Samsung C49G93TSSR and Samsung Odyssey G9 G95C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung C49G93TSSRSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C
85Gear score85
49″Screen size49″
5120×1440Resolution5120×1440
240 HzRefresh rate240 Hz
VAPanelVA
1 msResponse time1 ms
—Estimated price≈ $800

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung C49G93TSSR or Samsung Odyssey G9 G95C better?

Samsung C49G93TSSR and Samsung Odyssey G9 G95C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 85 and 85.

Similar comparisons

Samsung C49G93TSSR vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQMSamsung C49G93TSSR vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA EditionSamsung C49G93TSSR vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQMRSamsung C49G93TSSR vs MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLEDSamsung C49G93TSSR vs MSI MEG 342C QD OLEDSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQMSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM-G EVA EditionSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C vs ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQMRSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C vs MSI MAG 341CQP QD-OLEDSamsung Odyssey G9 G95C vs MSI MEG 342C QD OLED