Monitors / Comparison
Samsung CF390 vs Samsung CF391
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung CF391
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · VA · 2016Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel66
Response time60
Recency30
Verdict
Samsung CF390 and Samsung CF391 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 41.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Samsung CF390 | Samsung CF391 | |
|---|---|---|
| 40 | Gear score | 41 |
| 24″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Release year | 2016 |
| ≈ $70 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Samsung CF390 or Samsung CF391 better?
Samsung CF390 and Samsung CF391 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 40 and 41.