Monitors / Comparison

Samsung S27E390H vs Samsung T22C350ND

Monitor · Samsung

Samsung S27E390H

27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · PLS
GEAR SCORE 42.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel65
Response time60
VS
Monitor · Samsung

Samsung T22C350ND

21.5″ · 1920×1080 · 60 Hz · TN
GEAR SCORE 41.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution55
Panel50
Response time78
Verdict

Samsung S27E390H and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41.

  • Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Pick this

Samsung T22C350ND

If you care most about response time.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Samsung S27E390HSamsung T22C350ND
42Gear score41
27″Screen size21.5″
1920×1080Resolution1920×1080
60 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
PLSPanelTN
4 msResponse time2 ms

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is Samsung S27E390H or Samsung T22C350ND better?

Samsung S27E390H and Samsung T22C350ND are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 42 and 41. Response time: Samsung T22C350ND leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).

Similar comparisons

Samsung S27E390H vs ASUS ML239HSamsung S27E390H vs ASUS MX239HSamsung S27E390H vs ASUS MX279HSamsung S27E390H vs BenQ BL2410PTSamsung S27E390H vs BenQ BL2483Samsung T22C350ND vs ASUS MT276HESamsung T22C350ND vs ASUS PB238QSamsung T22C350ND vs ASUS VA249HESamsung T22C350ND vs Sony FWD48W650DSamsung T22C350ND vs Samsung SF351