Mice / Comparison

ATK Duckbill vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium

Mouse · ATK

ATK Duckbill

46 g · PAW3950 Ultra · Wireless
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Lightness88
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
VS
Mouse · Pulsar

Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium

47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · Wireless
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Lightness87
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
Verdict

ATK Duckbill and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.

  • ATK Duckbill is 1 g lighter (46 g vs 47 g).
Pick this

ATK Duckbill

If you care most about weight.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ATK DuckbillPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
95Gear score95
46 gWeight47 g
PAW3950 UltraSensorPulsar XS-2
42,000Max DPI42,000
8000 HzPolling rate8000 Hz
WirelessConnectionWireless

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is ATK Duckbill or Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium better?

ATK Duckbill and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. ATK Duckbill is 1 g lighter (46 g vs 47 g).

Which one is lighter?

ATK Duckbill is 1 g lighter (46 g vs 47 g).