Attack Shark R11 Ultra vs Pulsar X2F
Attack Shark R11 Ultra
49 g · PAW3950 Max · WirelessPulsar X2F
38 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessAttack Shark R11 Ultra and Pulsar X2F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar X2F is 11 g lighter (38 g vs 49 g).
- Max DPI: Attack Shark R11 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
Attack Shark R11 Ultra
If you care most about max DPI.
Pulsar X2F
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Attack Shark R11 Ultra | Pulsar X2F | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 49 g | Weight | 38 g |
| PAW3950 Max | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Attack Shark R11 Ultra or Pulsar X2F better?
Attack Shark R11 Ultra and Pulsar X2F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar X2F is 11 g lighter (38 g vs 49 g). Max DPI: Attack Shark R11 Ultra leads (42,000 vs 32,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2F is 11 g lighter (38 g vs 49 g).