Mice / Comparison

Attack Shark R11 Ultra vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium

Mouse · Attack Shark

Attack Shark R11 Ultra

49 g · PAW3950 Max · Wireless
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Lightness86
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
VS
Mouse · Pulsar

Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium

47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · Wireless
GEAR SCORE 95.0 / 100Top tier
Lightness87
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
Verdict

Attack Shark R11 Ultra and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.

  • Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 2 g lighter (47 g vs 49 g).
Pick this

Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium

If you care most about weight.

Spec-by-spec comparison

Attack Shark R11 UltraPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
95Gear score95
49 gWeight47 g
PAW3950 MaxSensorPulsar XS-2
42,000Max DPI42,000
8000 HzPolling rate8000 Hz
WirelessConnectionWireless

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

FAQ

Is Attack Shark R11 Ultra or Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium better?

Attack Shark R11 Ultra and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 2 g lighter (47 g vs 49 g).

Which one is lighter?

Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 2 g lighter (47 g vs 49 g).