Darmoshark M6 Fiber vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
Darmoshark M6 Fiber
39 g · PAW3950 · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessDarmoshark M6 Fiber and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Darmoshark M6 Fiber is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Darmoshark M6 Fiber
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
If you care most about max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Darmoshark M6 Fiber | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 39 g | Weight | 47 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-2 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 42,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Darmoshark M6 Fiber or Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium better?
Darmoshark M6 Fiber and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Darmoshark M6 Fiber is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Darmoshark M6 Fiber is 8 g lighter (39 g vs 47 g).