Lamzu Inca vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
Lamzu Inca
40 g · PAW3950 · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessLamzu Inca and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Lamzu Inca is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Lamzu Inca
If you care most about weight.
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
If you care most about max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Inca | Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 40 g | Weight | 47 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-2 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 42,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Inca or Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium better?
Lamzu Inca and Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Lamzu Inca is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Lamzu Inca is 7 g lighter (40 g vs 47 g).