Lamzu Inca vs Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
Lamzu Inca
40 g · PAW3950 · WirelessPulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
39 g · Pulsar XS-1 · WirelessLamzu Inca and Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini leads (32,000 vs 30,000).
Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini
If you care most about weight, max DPI.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Inca | Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 40 g | Weight | 39 g |
| PAW3950 | Sensor | Pulsar XS-1 |
| 30,000 | Max DPI | 32,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Inca or Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini better?
Lamzu Inca and Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g). Max DPI: Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini leads (32,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar X2H CrazyLight Mini is 1 g lighter (39 g vs 40 g).