Mice / Comparison
Lamzu Maya S V2 vs WLmouse Beast X V2 Med
Mouse · Lamzu
Lamzu Maya S V2
45 g · PAW NEXT I · WirelessTop tier
Lightness89
Sensor100
Polling rate100
Connection100
VS
Mouse · WLmouse
WLmouse Beast X V2 Med
45 g · PAW3955HS · WirelessTop tier
Lightness89
Sensor100
Polling rate100
Connection100
Verdict
Lamzu Maya S V2 and WLmouse Beast X V2 Med are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Lamzu Maya S V2 | WLmouse Beast X V2 Med | |
|---|---|---|
| 96 | Gear score | 96 |
| 45 g | Weight | 45 g |
| PAW NEXT I | Sensor | PAW3955HS |
| 50,000 | Max DPI | 50,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Lamzu Maya S V2 or WLmouse Beast X V2 Med better?
Lamzu Maya S V2 and WLmouse Beast X V2 Med are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 96 and 96.
Similar comparisons
Lamzu Maya S V2 vs Razer Viper V4 ProLamzu Maya S V2 vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniLamzu Maya S V2 vs Lamzu Maya X V2Lamzu Maya S V2 vs Lamzu IncaLamzu Maya S V2 vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 MiniWLmouse Beast X V2 Med vs Razer Viper V4 ProWLmouse Beast X V2 Med vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniWLmouse Beast X V2 Med vs Pulsar TenZ 2.0 MiniWLmouse Beast X V2 Med vs Pulsar X2 CrazyLight MiniWLmouse Beast X V2 Med vs Pulsar X2 CrazyLight