Mice / Comparison
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Valkyrie VK M5 Pro
Mouse · Pulsar
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessTop tier
Lightness87
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
VS
Mouse · Valkyrie
Valkyrie VK M5 Pro
50 g · PAW3950 · WirelessTop tier
Lightness85
Sensor99
Polling rate100
Connection100
Battery life100
Verdict
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and Valkyrie VK M5 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 3 g lighter (47 g vs 50 g).
Pick this
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | Valkyrie VK M5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 47 g | Weight | 50 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | PAW3950 |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 42,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
| — | Battery life | 170 h |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium or Valkyrie VK M5 Pro better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and Valkyrie VK M5 Pro are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 3 g lighter (47 g vs 50 g).
Which one is lighter?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium is 3 g lighter (47 g vs 50 g).
Similar comparisons
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Pulsar X2FPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Pulsar X2H CrazyLight MiniPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Pulsar X2N CrazyLight MiniPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2cPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniValkyrie VK M5 Pro vs Logitech G Pro X Superlight 2cValkyrie VK M5 Pro vs ASUS ROG Harpe Ace MiniValkyrie VK M5 Pro vs ASUS ROG Harpe II AceValkyrie VK M5 Pro vs Pulsar X2F