Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium vs WLmouse Beast G Medium
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
47 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessWLmouse Beast G Medium
38 g · PAW3950 HS · WirelessPulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and WLmouse Beast G Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95.
- WLmouse Beast G Medium is 9 g lighter (38 g vs 47 g).
- Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium
If you care most about max DPI.
WLmouse Beast G Medium
If you care most about weight.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium | WLmouse Beast G Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| 95 | Gear score | 95 |
| 47 g | Weight | 38 g |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | PAW3950 HS |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 30,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 8000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wireless |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium or WLmouse Beast G Medium better?
Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium and WLmouse Beast G Medium are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 95 and 95. WLmouse Beast G Medium is 9 g lighter (38 g vs 47 g). Max DPI: Pulsar TenZ 2.0 Medium leads (42,000 vs 30,000).
Which one is lighter?
WLmouse Beast G Medium is 9 g lighter (38 g vs 47 g).