Pulsar X2F CrazyLight vs SteelSeries Rival 100
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
29 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessOn the known specs, Pulsar X2F CrazyLight comes out ahead: better in 3 specs, versus 0 for SteelSeries Rival 100.
- Max DPI: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (42,000 vs 4,000).
- Polling rate: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz).
- Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is wireless; SteelSeries Rival 100 is wired.
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
If you care most about max DPI, polling rate, connection.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar X2F CrazyLight | SteelSeries Rival 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| 99 | Gear score | — |
| 29 g | Weight | — |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | — |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 4,000 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | 1000 Hz |
| Wireless | Connection | Wired |
| — | Release year | 2015 |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $160 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar X2F CrazyLight or SteelSeries Rival 100 better?
On the known specs, Pulsar X2F CrazyLight comes out ahead: better in 3 specs, versus 0 for SteelSeries Rival 100. Max DPI: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (42,000 vs 4,000). Polling rate: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (8000 Hz vs 1000 Hz). Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is wireless; SteelSeries Rival 100 is wired.