Pulsar X2F CrazyLight vs ZOWIE ZA13-C
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
29 g · Pulsar XS-2 · WirelessOn the known specs, Pulsar X2F CrazyLight comes out ahead: better in 2 specs, versus 0 for ZOWIE ZA13-C.
- Max DPI: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (42,000 vs 3,200).
- Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is wireless; ZOWIE ZA13-C is wired.
Pulsar X2F CrazyLight
If you care most about max DPI, connection.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Pulsar X2F CrazyLight | ZOWIE ZA13-C | |
|---|---|---|
| 99 | Gear score | — |
| 29 g | Weight | — |
| Pulsar XS-2 | Sensor | — |
| 42,000 | Max DPI | 3,200 |
| 8000 Hz | Polling rate | — |
| Wireless | Connection | Wired |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Pulsar X2F CrazyLight or ZOWIE ZA13-C better?
On the known specs, Pulsar X2F CrazyLight comes out ahead: better in 2 specs, versus 0 for ZOWIE ZA13-C. Max DPI: Pulsar X2F CrazyLight leads (42,000 vs 3,200). Pulsar X2F CrazyLight is wireless; ZOWIE ZA13-C is wired.