Compare / Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-10300
Core i3-10105F vs Core i3-10300: which is better?
Core i3-10105F and Core i3-10300 perform almost the same in games (1440p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i3-10105F offers better value for money.
VS
Head to head
31%
Gaming performance
31%
44/100
Part score
44/100
138 FPS
Average FPS
138 FPS
≈ $45 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $45 (used)
100/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core i3-10105F | Core i3-10300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Max boost | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2020 | 2020 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i3-10105FCore i3-10300
138average FPS
138average FPS