Compare / Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Core i3-7350K vs Ryzen 5 1600X: which is better?
Core i3-7350K and Ryzen 5 1600X perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 4070). Core i3-7350K offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i3-7350KValue: Core i3-7350K
Head to head
22%
Gaming performance
22%
34/100
Part score
34/100
97 FPS
Average FPS
97 FPS
≈ $23 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $39 (used)
100/100
Value for money
59/100
Specifications
| Core i3-7350K | Ryzen 5 1600X | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 2 | 6 |
| Max boost | 4.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 60 W | 95 W |
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | No |
| Release year | 2017 | 2017 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i3-7350KRyzen 5 1600X
97average FPS
97average FPS