Compare / Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-10700F
Core i5-11600K vs Core i7-10700F: which is better?
Core i5-11600K and Core i7-10700F perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 4070). Core i5-11600K offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i5-11600KValue: Core i5-11600K
Head to head
50%
Gaming performance
49%
62/100
Part score
61/100
213 FPS
Average FPS
211 FPS
≈ $102 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $135 (used)
100/100
Value for money
74/100
Specifications
| Core i5-11600K | Core i7-10700F | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Max boost | 4.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | No |
| Release year | 2021 | 2020 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i5-11600KCore i7-10700F
213average FPS
211average FPS