Compare / Core i9-10900F vs Core i5-11600K
Core i9-10900F vs Core i5-11600K: which is better?
Core i9-10900F and Core i5-11600K perform almost the same in games (1440p · high settings · RTX 4070). Core i5-11600K offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i5-11600KValue: Core i5-11600K
Head to head
54%
Gaming performance
50%
65/100
Part score
62/100
193 FPS
Average FPS
190 FPS
≈ $213 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $102 (used)
51/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core i9-10900F | Core i5-11600K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 10 | 6 |
| Max boost | 5.2 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1200 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2020 | 2021 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-10900FCore i5-11600K
193average FPS
190average FPS