Compare / Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265K
Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 7 265K: which is better?
Core i9-13900F and Core Ultra 7 265K perform almost the same in games (1440p · competitive settings · RTX 5090). Core Ultra 7 265K offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core Ultra 7 265KValue: Core Ultra 7 265K
Head to head
83%
Gaming performance
80%
88/100
Part score
86/100
347 FPS
Average FPS
341 FPS
≈ $416
Approx. price
≈ $390
98/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core i9-13900F | Core Ultra 7 265K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 20 / 20 |
| Max boost | 5.6 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2023 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-13900FCore Ultra 7 265K
347average FPS
341average FPS