Compare / Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 9 285
Core i9-13900F vs Core Ultra 9 285: which is better?
Core i9-13900F and Core Ultra 9 285 perform almost the same in games (1440p · competitive settings · RTX 5090). Core i9-13900F offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i9-13900FValue: Core i9-13900F
Head to head
83%
Gaming performance
81%
88/100
Part score
86/100
347 FPS
Average FPS
343 FPS
≈ $416
Approx. price
≈ $560
100/100
Value for money
72/100
Specifications
| Core i9-13900F | Core Ultra 9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max boost | 5.6 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2023 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-13900FCore Ultra 9 285
347average FPS
343average FPS