Compare / Core i9-14900 vs Core Ultra 9 285K
Core i9-14900 vs Core Ultra 9 285K: which is better?
Core i9-14900 and Core Ultra 9 285K perform almost the same in games (1440p · competitive settings · RTX 5090). Core i9-14900 offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i9-14900Value: Core i9-14900
Head to head
86%
Gaming performance
85%
90/100
Part score
89/100
351 FPS
Average FPS
350 FPS
≈ $520
Approx. price
≈ $560
100/100
Value for money
92/100
Specifications
| Core i9-14900 | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 24 / 24 |
| Max boost | 5.8 GHz | 5.7 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | Yes |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-14900Core Ultra 9 285K
351average FPS
350average FPS