Compare / Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 7 265K
Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 7 265K: which is better?
Core i9-14900F is about 4% faster than Core Ultra 7 265K in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core Ultra 7 265K offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Core i9-14900FCheaper: Core Ultra 7 265KValue: Core Ultra 7 265K
Head to head
86%
Gaming performance
80%
90/100
Part score
86/100
322 FPS
Average FPS
311 FPS
≈ $520
Approx. price
≈ $390
80/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core i9-14900F | Core Ultra 7 265K | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 20 / 20 |
| Max boost | 5.8 GHz | 5.5 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-14900FCore Ultra 7 265K
322average FPS
311average FPS