Compare / Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 9 285
Core i9-14900F vs Core Ultra 9 285: which is better?
Core i9-14900F and Core Ultra 9 285 perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i9-14900F offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i9-14900FValue: Core i9-14900F
Head to head
86%
Gaming performance
81%
90/100
Part score
86/100
322 FPS
Average FPS
313 FPS
≈ $520
Approx. price
≈ $560
100/100
Value for money
88/100
Specifications
| Core i9-14900F | Core Ultra 9 285 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 24 | 24 |
| Max boost | 5.8 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1851 |
| Memory | DDR4 / DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2024 | 2024 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core i9-14900FCore Ultra 9 285
322average FPS
313average FPS