Compare / Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core i9-13900T
Core Ultra 7 265F vs Core i9-13900T: which is better?
Core Ultra 7 265F and Core i9-13900T perform almost the same in games (1080p · competitive settings · RTX 4070). Core Ultra 7 265F offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core Ultra 7 265FValue: Core Ultra 7 265F
Head to head
76%
Gaming performance
75%
83/100
Part score
82/100
327 FPS
Average FPS
326 FPS
≈ $390
Approx. price
≈ $416
100/100
Value for money
92/100
Specifications
| Core Ultra 7 265F | Core i9-13900T | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 20 | 24 |
| Max boost | 5.3 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 35 W |
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| Memory | DDR5 | DDR4 / DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2024 | 2023 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core Ultra 7 265FCore i9-13900T
327average FPS
326average FPS