Compare / Core Ultra 9 285K vs Core i9-13900
Core Ultra 9 285K vs Core i9-13900: which is better?
Core Ultra 9 285K and Core i9-13900 perform almost the same in games (1080p · high settings · RTX 5090). Core i9-13900 offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i9-13900Value: Core i9-13900
Head to head
85%
Gaming performance
83%
89/100
Part score
88/100
320 FPS
Average FPS
317 FPS
≈ $560
Approx. price
≈ $416
76/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Core Ultra 9 285K | Core i9-13900 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 24 / 24 | 24 |
| Max boost | 5.7 GHz | 5.6 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 125 W | 65 W |
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA1700 |
| Memory | DDR5 | DDR4 / DDR5 |
| Integrated graphics | Yes | Yes |
| Release year | 2024 | 2023 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Core Ultra 9 285KCore i9-13900
320average FPS
317average FPS