Compare / GeForce GTX 680 vs Intel Arc A310
GTX 680 vs Arc A310: which is better?
Intel Arc A310 is about 7% faster than GeForce GTX 680 in games (4K · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). GeForce GTX 680 offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Intel Arc A310Cheaper: GeForce GTX 680Value: GeForce GTX 680
Head to head
3%
Gaming performance
3%
20/100
Part score
18/100
14 FPS
Average FPS
15 FPS
≈ $48 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
100/100
Value for money
33/100
Specifications
| GeForce GTX 680 | Intel Arc A310 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 195 W | 75 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 550 W | ≥ 450 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | XeSS |
| Ray tracing | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2012 | 2022 |
GeForce GTX 680: 2 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Intel Arc A310: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
GeForce GTX 680Intel Arc A310
14average FPS
15average FPS