Compare / GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon R9 Nano
GTX TITAN X vs R9 Nano: which is better?
GeForce GTX TITAN X is about 21% faster than Radeon R9 Nano in games (1440p · high settings · Ryzen 5 7600). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: GeForce GTX TITAN XCheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
8%
Gaming performance
7%
33/100
Part score
30/100
86 FPS
Average FPS
71 FPS
≈ $144 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
95/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| GeForce GTX TITAN X | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 250 W | 175 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 600 W | ≥ 550 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2015 | 2015 |
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
GeForce GTX TITAN XRadeon R9 Nano
86average FPS
71average FPS
Competitive games
Other games
More comparisons
GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 980 TiGeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 1660GeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 1070GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon R9 Fury XGeForce GTX TITAN X vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERGeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon RX 5500 XTGeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon R9 FuryGeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon RX 590