Compare / Radeon R9 280X vs GeForce GTX 680
R9 280X vs GTX 680: which is better?
Radeon R9 280X is about 27% faster than GeForce GTX 680 in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 5 7600). GeForce GTX 680 offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Radeon R9 280XCheaper: GeForce GTX 680Value: GeForce GTX 680
Head to head
3%
Gaming performance
3%
21/100
Part score
20/100
52 FPS
Average FPS
41 FPS
≈ $56 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $48 (used)
91/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Radeon R9 280X | GeForce GTX 680 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 3 GB | 2 GB |
| Board power | 250 W | 195 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 600 W | ≥ 550 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2013 | 2012 |
Radeon R9 280X: 3 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
GeForce GTX 680: 2 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon R9 280XGeForce GTX 680
52average FPS
41average FPS