Compare / Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon R9 Nano
R9 Fury X vs R9 Nano: which is better?
Radeon R9 Fury X is about 6% faster than Radeon R9 Nano in games (4K · high settings · Ryzen 5 7600). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Radeon R9 Fury XCheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
8%
Gaming performance
7%
31/100
Part score
30/100
38 FPS
Average FPS
36 FPS
≈ $128 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
97/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 275 W | 175 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 650 W | ≥ 550 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2015 | 2015 |
Radeon R9 Fury X: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon R9 Fury XRadeon R9 Nano
38average FPS
36average FPS