Compare / Radeon R9 Nano vs GeForce GTX 1650
R9 Nano vs GTX 1650: which is better?
Radeon R9 Nano is about 17% faster than GeForce GTX 1650 in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 7 9800X3D). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Radeon R9 NanoCheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
7%
Gaming performance
6%
30/100
Part score
27/100
102 FPS
Average FPS
87 FPS
≈ $112 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $176 (used)
100/100
Value for money
51/100
Specifications
| Radeon R9 Nano | GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 175 W | 75 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 550 W | ≥ 450 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2015 | 2019 |
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
GeForce GTX 1650: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon R9 NanoGeForce GTX 1650
102average FPS
87average FPS