Compare / Radeon RX Vega 56 vs Radeon R9 Nano
RX Vega 56 vs R9 Nano: which is better?
Radeon RX Vega 56 is about 25% faster than Radeon R9 Nano in games (1080p · high settings · Ryzen 5 7600). Radeon R9 Nano offers better value for money.
VS
Faster: Radeon RX Vega 56Cheaper: Radeon R9 NanoValue: Radeon R9 Nano
Head to head
10%
Gaming performance
7%
35/100
Part score
30/100
127 FPS
Average FPS
102 FPS
≈ $160 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $112 (used)
98/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Radeon RX Vega 56 | Radeon R9 Nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Video memory (VRAM) | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Board power | 210 W | 175 W |
| Recommended PSU | ≥ 600 W | ≥ 550 W |
| AI upscaling | FSR | FSR |
| Ray tracing | No | No |
| Release year | 2017 | 2015 |
Radeon RX Vega 56: 8 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Radeon R9 Nano: 4 GB of video memory can run short in new games (Cyberpunk 2077, Warzone) with high textures and at 1440p; you may need to drop textures a notch.
Free · no install
How many FPS does your graphics card get?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Radeon RX Vega 56Radeon R9 Nano
127average FPS
102average FPS
Competitive games
Other games
More comparisons
Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1660 SUPERRadeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1660 TiRadeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1070 TiRadeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce RTX 3050Radeon RX Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPERRadeon RX Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 5500 XTRadeon RX Vega 56 vs Radeon R9 FuryRadeon RX Vega 56 vs Radeon RX 590