Compare / Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i3-7300
Ryzen 5 1600 vs Core i3-7300: which is better?
Ryzen 5 1600 and Core i3-7300 perform almost the same in games (1440p · competitive settings · RTX 5090). Core i3-7300 offers better value for money.
VS
Cheaper: Core i3-7300Value: Core i3-7300
Head to head
21%
Gaming performance
21%
33/100
Part score
33/100
118 FPS
Average FPS
115 FPS
≈ $39 (used)
Approx. price
≈ $23 (used)
60/100
Value for money
100/100
Specifications
| Ryzen 5 1600 | Core i3-7300 | |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / threads | 6 / 12 | 2 |
| Max boost | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 51 W |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| Memory | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Integrated graphics | No | Yes |
| Release year | 2017 | 2017 |
Free · no install
Is your CPU holding back your graphics card?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
Estimated FPS in games
Ryzen 5 1600Core i3-7300
118average FPS
115average FPS