Acer B287K bmiipprzx vs Acer UM.CC0AA.001
Acer B287K bmiipprzx
28″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSAcer UM.CC0AA.001
34″ · 3440×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSAcer B287K bmiipprzx and Acer UM.CC0AA.001 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: Acer B287K bmiipprzx leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Acer B287K bmiipprzx
If you care most about resolution.
Acer UM.CC0AA.001
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer B287K bmiipprzx | Acer UM.CC0AA.001 | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 28″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $340 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer B287K bmiipprzx or Acer UM.CC0AA.001 better?
Acer B287K bmiipprzx and Acer UM.CC0AA.001 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: Acer B287K bmiipprzx leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer UM.CC0AA.001 leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).