Acer Nitro EDA270U P vs ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
Acer Nitro EDA270U P
27″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro EDA270U P and ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA270U P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Acer Nitro EDA270U P
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro EDA270U P | ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 170 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| — | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $180 | Estimated price | ≈ $550 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro EDA270U P or ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV better?
Acer Nitro EDA270U P and ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA270U P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro EDA270U P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Acer Nitro EDA270U P ≈ $180, ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV ≈ $550. Current prices vary by store.