Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip vs ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAcer Nitro KG271 M3biip and ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip | ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $200 | Estimated price | ≈ $550 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip or ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV better?
Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip and ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip leads (0.5 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Acer Nitro KG271 M3biip ≈ $200, ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV ≈ $550. Current prices vary by store.