Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx vs Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 32QHD165
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAcer XV320QU LVbmiiphx and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74.
- Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx leads (0.5 ms vs 3 ms).
Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx
If you care most about response time.
Corsair XENEON 32QHD165
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx | Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 74 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 0.5 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx or Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 better?
Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx and Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 74. Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Acer XV320QU LVbmiiphx leads (0.5 ms vs 3 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Corsair XENEON 32QHD165 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).