Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel vs Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel
27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung LS34J550WQUXEN
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAchieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel | Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34.1″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel or Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN better?
Achieva QH2700-IPSMS DP Thunderbolt Perfect Pixel and Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).